The Terms of Service (TOS) for Google Analytics basically say that they can do whatever they want with the data they collect from your sites and this includes using that information to determine search engine rankings.
By installing the Google Analytics code on your site, you are giving Google a back door window into your traffic patterns and they will quickly determine that your (affiliate) site is not the kind of site they want in their index. You see, Google doesn’t really like affiliate sites. Perhaps I should qualify that assertion a bit more. Google doesn’t like little-guy affiliate sites; they don’t seem to have a problem with the big guys and large corporations running affiliate ads on their sites.
It’s a long time since I did any PPC advertising with Adwords but I hear the same thing from affiliates using it as an advertising platform. The “Google Slap” has affected thousands of such affiliates when they find that formerly successful campaigns suddenly command keyword bids of $5 when they used to cost a few cents or a few tens of cents.
The conclusion would seem to be that Google doesn’t appear to like little-guy affiliates. So some double standards appear to be in operation in how Google deals with little-guy and big-guy affiliates.
It makes a mockery of their supposed mission statement of: “First Do No Evil”.
I had an affiliate site with a Pagerank (PR) of 5 that has been online for 12 years. It attained its PR5 rank a few years back and stayed at that level all that time. Then, a couple of months ago it dropped to PR3. I couldn’t figure out why it had been demoted. It’s been an affiliate site for many years (albeit a content-rich one), the website hadn’t undergone any redesign that might have flagged it to Google. So I was at a loss to determine the cause of the PageRank drop. That was, until I came across some comments from other affiliates regarding the use of Google Analytics. You see, up until a few months ago, I was lazy in tracking the traffic to the site so I didn’t have any tracking code on it. And then I added Google Analytics. Shortly after, the site was demoted. Draw your own conclusions.
Ok, so Google set the rules and if we want to play we have to abide by them if we don’t want to have our Adsense accounts closed down. But there’s nothing in their TOS that says we, as affiliates, have to make it easy for them.
And that means not using Google Analytics to track the performance of your sites. There are other trackers and stats packages out there like Piwik, StatCounter or Clicky.
You may also want to consider whether to use Google’s Webmaster Tools and/or the Google Pagerank Toolbar in your browser. They’re not as hard to pin down as a source of data collection as Analytics so some affiliates think they’re ok to use.
The conclusion appears to be that if you want to have your affiliate site indexed, and stay in Google’s index, that using Google Analytics (and possibly Google Webmaster Tools and the PageRank Toolbar) is a bad idea.
Some other points:
Google has the power to drive a huge amount of traffic to your sites each month and they’re the biggest player in town in this regard. So, as affiliate webmasters, we need to appease Google by staying within their TOS.
Google doesn’t want affiliate sites in its index. Assuming you minimise the ways Google can collect data from your sites, they can still be recognised as affiliate sites and once Google knows that, they will in all likelihood get a lower ranking.
Google employs thousands of people to evaluate and review websites. Given the total number of websites online, these reviewers don’t spend more than a few seconds glancing at a homepage. Perhaps 1-2% of site reviews will involve a deeper look. So spending a bit of extra time on your homepage and the content on it is probably a good idea.
Conclusion
Despite Google’s lack of enthusiasm for affiliate sites, a large part of online ecommerce is done through them. Merchants like affiliates because they put their products in front of a wider audience. Google itself provides an affiliate program with Adsense. So they’re happy for webmasters to put Adsense on their sites to prop up Adwords. They like quality sites though and that’s one thing I agree with. But when it comes to webmasters putting ads for other ad networks in front of visitors, well…that’s a different story.
So, when you’re building a new site, here’s a suggestion: For the first 3 or 4 weeks, put Google Analytics on the site but do not put any ads or affiliate links on the site (no Kontera, Chitika or either). Have only good quality content on the site. That should be enough time for the site to get indexed and be flagged as a content site rather than an affiliate site.
Then remove Google Analytics (and the entry for the site from the Google Analytics dashboard) and replace it with tracking code from some other tracking service. Remove any Google metatags or verification HTML files (provided by Google Webmaster Tools) and start turning on your ads and affiliate links.
All the best,
Gary Nugent
P.S.: Don't forget, if you want to create an internet income of your own, here's one of my recommended ways to do that:
Tagged with: Adwords • Affiliate Sites • Analytics • Assertion • Back Door • Bad Idea • Big Guys • Campaigns • Google • Google Analytics Code • Keyword Bids • Large Corporations • Mission Statement • Mockery • Pagerank • Ppc Advertising • Search Engine Rankings • Slap • Tos • Traffic Patterns
Filed under: Stats & Tracking
Very interesting observation. And easy enough to do. Also there is no downside, nor an upside to GA except for the initial 4-6 weeks. Thanks
Thank you for this good information. I had heard from other sources that it was not a good idea to monetize a new site for at least 4 weeks but I didn’t understand why – just that it would get the site put in the Google sandbox for 6 mo. – or forever. I am also confused about how the auto site generators (as well as affiliate plugins, etc.) can make claims that you can put up a new, monetized site (that does include good content), drive traffic to it and get immediate sales. I want to set up some sites but I don’t want to waste my good domains names by making sites that google is going to sandbox. Do the auto site generators really work (if you don’t use google analytics)? I am not a techie and I sure would like to use an auto site generator.
You’re dead on with this Gary. The very nature of Google is the reason it becomes harder for a successful affiliate to rank well over time. As a marketer’s business grows they become more organized and tech savvy. The result is more consistant domain registrant data, a larger number of sites published with the same footprint, all the way up to the leasing of a dedicated server with private name servers and IP’s that are used exclusively for this one person’s sites.
Even worse is the fact that while you may be smart enough to run your own license of a different analytics solution, a large number of other sites don’t. So when your website or backlinking software, etc. reach out to the community, Google is still tracking your connections, logging the unique identifiers, and connecting the dots across numerous sites.
Google provides us with some valuable tools and information for our projects. However, for the reasons you illustrated and more, those of us engaged in marketing activities should take precautionary measures such as logging out of our Google accounts and clearing cookies when we’re done using their tools – for starters. I’m at the point where I do almost everything behind a quality paid proxy service. And when I’m running submission software I do it while connected to the WiFi at one of several local Starbucks. I feel more protected and it gives me an excuse to leave the house and get a good coffee buzz going.
Happy New Year!
Marcia: My own site generator – SiteBuilder Elite (http://www.sitebuilderelite.com) – defaults to displaying no ads when a site is created. Ad networks can be turned on as and when you like but I think waiting those 3-4 weeks before doing that helps your site’s rankings.
New sites can get indexed quite quickly by Google, rise in the ranks and start earning almost immediately (if they have ads). When Google realises they’re affiliate sites, they drop in the rankings and earnings go down. And sometimes the site gets sandboxed. But that can happen regardless of the software you use to build a site. Webmasters need to think in terms of months in looking at how a site is perfoming not the initial blip that can happen after a new site launches.
SiteBuilder Elite allows you to configure your site in many ways and you can have it download articles to your pages or upload your own articles for more unique content. It also allows you to drip feed new pages to a site on autopilot so it looks like there’s a human behind it adding a couple of new pages every few days. It does a ton of other stuff too.
Gary.
I recently attended a social media conference and one of the speakers said that Google’s PageRank is basically worthless and Google isn’t really even using it anymore or giving it credence. Not to say that small affiliate sites aren’t getting negatively impacted in search results due to Google Analytics.
But I do know that if you’re looking for valuable metrics on performance and ranking, there are plenty of other sites out there like Alexa and QuantCast where you can install similar tracking codes on your site to deliver more meaningful metrics regarding search rankings, top keywords searched, and the demographics of your customers.
I agree with you.
First of all, it takes too long for you to see any results-24 to 72 hours.
StatCounter returned results in under an hour. I’ll leave it on my site for a couple more weeks but as soon as I get indexed, GA is gone.
That’s for the tip advising us not to put up any affiliate links on our sites.
I had heard it mentioned once before not to put ads on our sites and I totally forgot about it until now. Removing Amazon widget, saving for another time.
Thanks again for a great post.
Gary,
I want to thank you for your detailed explanation as I was not even aware that Google does not really approve of small affiliate sites.
The blog title really intrigued me and thanks again for sharing your expertise
So, what if I’ve had GA on the site for a year or so? Is there any hope in getting better SERPS if I take it off? Thanks for the great info. I found your link off one of your sales in Flippa.
Hi Kyile,
I use Piwik for site statistics. It’s a free PHP script that provides the same kind of information as Google Analytics without having Google looking over your shoulder. Being a PHP script, you have to do the installation yourself but it’s pretty simple. I recommend putting it on its own domain, though it will happily run in a subdomain. You could install it in a subfolder on an existing domain but it might impact the page loading speed of that domain, especially on a shared hosting account.
Gary
Tried piwik, but yeah, its definetly not for shared hosting. I do believe though that while Google for sure is using analytics data for its SERP, it using it as a broad pointers if you like regarding traffic etc for whatever they require but not actually using it to target site per site.
You make a very solid case why not to use Google Analytics.
However the main reason I find people dont put it in, is because it is such a performance drag. I have seen sites that load in under 2 seconds, when the Google Analytics code is added, that the load time rockets up to over 10 seconds.
I am sure you are well aware of the 5 second rule, where if your site hasnt loaded and grabbed your visitors attention in 5 seconds or less, you have now lost that potential client.